Coupled Cluster Theory

 


Pair theory is a physically inspired approach to incorporating electron correlation. According to Pauli’s principle, no more than two electrons are allowed to come close to each other, resulting in the idea that pair correlation must represent the major part of electron correlation. Pair theory is a particular type of coupled cluster theory. This theory uses a wave function which can be generally written as a sum of

 

 

where  describes the correlation of two,  of three electrons etc. This expansion is finite and the series can be calculated recursively from . When the expansion is truncated after , this is referred to as pair theory. Pair theory can be split into several categories, among which are IEPA (independent electron-pair approximation) and CEPA (coupled electron-pair approximation), which is also known as CCD (coupled cluster double excitation).[i],[ii],[iii]

            First introduced in nuclear physics,[iv] this approach was adapted for the molecular problem by Cizek.[v] This method satisfies the size-consistency condition, but like the MP method, not variational. It offers a better approximation than perturbation theory, if the correlation correction is large (i.e. large perturbation means that the MP method becomes unreliable).

Starting with the HF reference wave function (in the ground state), the CC procedure is based on the exponential ansatz :

 

,

 

where  is the cluster operator of a N electron-containing system:

 

 

and the individual members are defined as follows:

 

                       

                         analogous to triple substitutions.

 

In these expressions, the indices, i, j, k, l,..., characterize occupied spin-orbitals and r, s, t, u, .... virtual spin-orbitals. Introducing substitution operators, e.g. for a double substitutions (), which are defined by their influence on the HF wave function (= if the HF determinant is the reference):

 

.

Here,  corresponds to a "doubly-excited" single-determinant function in which the spin-orbital, i (j), is substituted by the virtual spin-orbital, r (s). The operator, , is antisymmetric in both (ij) and (rs).

            In a CC calculation, the a-coefficients, which control the degree of orbital substitution, have to be determined. From these coefficients, the wave function and the energies can be derived. If the wave function of the Schrödinger equation is substituted for the above exponential expansion, equations which allow the determination of the coefficients are derived. However, the derivation is non-trivial and the resultant equations are both complex and non-linear.

            In practice, the CCD method is most commonly applied. This method uses a wave function containing all possible double excitations.[vi] This is mathematically achieved by approximating the cluster operator as:

 

,

 

so that the wave function can be expressed as

 

 

The product of the operators, , is treated as zero, if any of the eight indices are identical. If not, it leads to a quadruple substitution and becomes:

 

 

The equations for the a-coefficients are obtained by projection of  :

 

 

onto the function  and

 

               and finally

 

 

These equations are sufficient to determine the energy, E, and the unknown a coefficients. Due to the quadratic term, 1/2, this system contains coupled, non-linear equations which can be solved iteratively. Neglecting this quadratic term leads to an approximation known as the linear CCD method (LCCD), or CEPA, according to the degree of approximation applied to the quadratic terms. The coupled cluster method is rapidly becoming a more important technique in computational chemistry. The CCSD [vii] (coupled cluster including single and double substitutions) has been now extensively compared with CI for energies, equilibrium structures and infrared intensities in a variety of molecules. Results obtained indicate the superiority of CCSD over the CISD method. It is assumed that size consistency plays an important rule. Like CISD, the CCD and CCSD methods do not adequately account for triple substitutions. Some approximate treatments, which include triple terms have been introduced [CCSD(T)].[viii],[ix]

 



[i]           P. Carsky, M. Urban in: Ab initio Calculations; Lecture Notes in Chemistry, No. 16, Springer, Berlin 1980.

[ii]          A. Szabo, N. S. Ostlund in: Modern Quantum Chemistry, McGraw-Hill, New York  1989.

[iii]          R. J. Bartlett, J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 1697.

[iv]          F. Coester, Nucl. Phys. 1958, 7, 421.

[v]           J. Cizek, J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 45, 4256.

[vi]          J. A. Pople, R. Krishnan, H. B. Schlegel, J. S. Binkley, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 1978,   XIV, 545.

[vii]         G. E. Scuseria, C. L. Janssen, H. F. Schäfer III, J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 12, 7382.

[viii]        M. Urban, J. Noga, S. J. Cole, R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 4041.

[ix]          J. A. Pople, M. Head-Gordon, K. Raghavachari, J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 87, 5968.



last changes: 01.04.2008, AS
questions & comments to: axel.schulz@uni-rostock.de