Møller-Plesset Perturbation Theory

 


A different approach to electron correlation has become very popular in recent years: The Møller- Plesset method.[i] Here, higher excitations are taken into account by a perturbation operator () within the many body perturbation theory introduced by Rayleigh and Schrödinger. The HF problem is treated as the unperturbated wave function and the residual part of the Hamiltonian is treated as a perturbation:

 

.

 

The application of the perturbation theory is justified, if the contribution of electron correlation energy (the "perturbation“) is small. This is usually the case. The conditions are:

 

1) From the HF computation, the energy eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are known (corresponding to the solution of the unperturbated system with ,  (HF Slater determinant) and ):

 

.

 

2)  If the perturbation is small, then  and  lie close to the exact wave function,

and the energy, E.

 

Assuming these two conditions, a generalized electronic Hamiltonian () can be defined as:

 

.

 

Expanding the wave function () and energy as a power series:

 

 

 

where l is an arbitrary parameter, to keep track of the orders of perturbation applied.

 and El represent the exact or full CI (within a given basis set) ground state wave function and energy for a system described by the Hamiltonian, . Note that for = 0,  equals the unperturbated operator (0th power) .

The following eigenvalue equation now has to be solved:

 

.

 

Substituting the wave function and energy by the power series:

 

 

Expanding the products and collecting like terms of l together and equating them (since l is arbitrary) the energies setting l = 1, are given by

 

,  ... .

 

All resulting terms can be expressed in terms of  and the determinable term . The unperturbated, ground state wave function and energy can be written in terms of the occupied, one-electron spin orbitals,, and the energy of any single spin orbital, ei.

.

 

            Møller and Plesset introduced the following expression for the perturbation operator:

 

.

 

E(0) is the sum of the one-electron energies and therefore, only the sum E(0) + E(1)

 

 

represents the HF energy since Y(0) corresponds to the HF wave function.

To calculate  the first order wave function  has to be known. This is given by:

 

.

 

The energy, , corresponding to a determinant, , is the sum of one-electron energies of those spin-orbitals which are occupied.  are the matrix elements of the perturbation operator. It can be shown that  does not become zero, if s corresponds to a determinant with double substitutions. Thus only double substitutions contribute to the first order wave function.

Due to the good cost (CPU time) to accuracy ratio, the power expansion is often truncated after the second order, known as MP2 level, for which the energy is:

 

.

 

The energy  ( are spin orbitals; where indices, i and j, correspond to the occupied spin orbitals, , and indices, r and s, correspond to the unoccupied spin orbitals, ) is given by:

 

 

            The third order energy, like MP2 only incorporates contributions from double substitutions.[ii],[iii] At MP4 level alone, are additional single, double, triple (MP4 SDT)and quadruple (MP4 SDTQ) substitutions included.[iv],[v] The MPn method is size-consistent, but not variational. Its principle deficiency is that MP series sometimes converges slowly, especially in systems where the effects of correlation are large (corresponding to a large perturbation). The MP method is practical to fourth order, however, it is limited to relatively small systems at MP4 level. The MP2 method has been used extensively even for larger systems. In practice, MP2 must be used with reasonable basis sets (e.g. 6-31G* or better). Subsequent MP3, MP4 and MP5 are more complicated and much more time-consuming.

To save CPU time and disc space, MP computations are often carried out with a frozen core (FC) which indicates that correlation effects on the total energy of the inner-shell electrons are excluded from calculation. That is, only valence-shell electrons are considered in the electron-correlation computation. This procedure utilizes the fact that only valence electrons take part in chemical bond formation. In contrast to a frozen core computation, a calculation where all electron correlations are included is called a full MPn calculation.

 

 



[i]           C. Møller, M. S. Plesset, Phys. Rev. 1934, 46, 618.

[ii]          R. J. Bartlett, D. M. Silver, J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 62, 3258.

[iii]         a) J. A. Pople, J. S. Binkley, R. Seeger, Int. J. Quant. Chem., Quant. Chem. Symp.  1976, 10, 1;

              b) J. A. Pople, R. Seeger, R. Krishnan, ibid., Symp. 1977, 11, 149.

[iv]          R. J. Bartlett, I. Shavitt, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1977, 50, 190.

[v]           R. Krishnan, J. A. Pople, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 1978, 14, 91.



last changes: 01.04.2008, AS
questions & comments to: axel.schulz@uni-rostock.de